Sometimes Marketing Efforts by Advocacy Organizations Can Lose Touch With the Nuances of Appropriateness

    November 2004 in “ Oncology Times
    Eric T. Rosenthal
    TLDR Advocacy groups should avoid marketing partnerships that may imply drug endorsements.
    The document discussed a controversial marketing partnership between the National Prostate Cancer Coalition (NPCC) and Bayer Pharmaceuticals' Viadur, which raised ethical concerns about advocacy organizations endorsing specific drugs. The campaign aimed to raise awareness and funds for prostate cancer screening, generating $5,227 through 5,227 clicks on the Viadur logo. Critics argued that such partnerships could imply drug endorsements, raising conflict-of-interest issues. The NPCC defended the campaign as a transparent effort to support prostate cancer awareness without endorsing Viadur. Additionally, the document mentioned a study linking long-term insulin therapy in Type 2 diabetes patients to a threefold increased risk of colorectal cancer, highlighting the need for effective cancer prevention efforts.
    Discuss this study in the Community →