A Side-by-Side Study of 20 Consecutive FUE Patients Comparing the Use of a 0.9mm Sharp vs. 0.9mm Blunt Punch

    David Josephitis, Ron Shapiro
    TLDR Both punch types are effective, but they differ in transection rates and ease of use.
    The study compared the use of a 0.9mm sharp punch versus a 0.9mm blunt punch in follicular unit extraction (FUE) procedures across 20 consecutive patients. The research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of each punch type in hair transplantation. The findings indicated that both punch types were effective, but there were differences in transection rates and ease of use. The study provided insights into the advantages and limitations of each punch type, contributing to the ongoing development and refinement of FUE techniques.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    1 / 1 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 261 results

      community Verteporfin and Microneedling

      in Treatments 1 year ago
      Clinical studies by Dr. Barghouthi and Dr. Bloxham indicate that Verteporfin, when used with FUE and FUT hair transplantation methods, shows promise in hair follicle regeneration and minimal scarring due to its ability to inhibit Yes-associated protein (YAP). Microneedling at depths of 3-3.5mm, combined with Verteporfin, could potentially reactivate dormant follicles, although the optimal dosage and application method are still under investigation. Concerns remain about the DHT sensitivity of regenerated follicles, highlighting the need for further research to optimize trauma levels and Verteporfin concentrations to achieve effective and scar-free hair regeneration.

    Similar Research

    6 / 1000+ results