How does Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) differ from DHT-blocking treatments for androgenic alopecia?
← back to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
How Does Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Differ from DHT-Blocking Treatments for Androgenic Alopecia?
Androgenic alopecia, commonly known as male or female pattern hair loss, is the most prevalent cause of progressive hair thinning worldwide. The World Health Organization and the National Institutes of Health describe it as a genetically influenced condition driven primarily by sensitivity of hair follicles to androgens, particularly dihydrotestosterone (DHT). In simple terms, hair follicles in susceptible individuals gradually shrink under hormonal influence, producing thinner and shorter hairs over time.
Two biological pathways are often discussed in modern research on this condition. One centers on blocking DHT, the hormone most strongly linked to follicle miniaturization. The other focuses on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that promotes blood vessel formation and improves blood supply around hair follicles. Although both approaches relate to hair growth, they act through fundamentally different mechanisms. Understanding these differences requires examining what DHT does to hair follicles, what VEGF does in human tissues, and how research evaluates each strategy.
Understanding DHT: The Hormonal Driver of Follicle Miniaturization
Dihydrotestosterone is a potent derivative of testosterone. It is produced when the enzyme 5-alpha-reductase converts testosterone into DHT within tissues such as the scalp. Research published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism in 1974 demonstrated that men with a genetic deficiency of 5-alpha-reductase type II do not develop male pattern baldness, strongly implicating DHT in androgenic alopecia (Imperato-McGinley et al., 1974). The study observed human participants with this rare genetic condition and compared them with unaffected individuals. The evaluation involved clinical observation of hair patterns and hormonal measurements. The limitation of this study is that it focused on a rare population, which may not represent typical androgenic alopecia cases.
Later scalp biopsy research, including work published in 1990 in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism by Sawaya and Price, measured androgen receptor levels in balding versus non-balding scalp tissue in men. Using tissue samples from human participants, researchers evaluated receptor density and enzyme activity. They found higher androgen receptor expression and 5-alpha-reductase activity in balding scalp areas. The method involved biochemical assays and tissue analysis. The main criticism is the small sample size typical of biopsy studies and the invasive nature of sampling.
DHT-blocking treatments aim to reduce this hormonal effect. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oral finasteride in 1997 for male pattern hair loss after large randomized controlled trials demonstrated efficacy. One pivotal study published in 1998 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology followed 1,553 men for one year. Participants were randomized to receive finasteride or placebo. Hair counts were measured using standardized scalp photography and computerized hair counting techniques. The finasteride group showed significant increases in hair count compared with placebo. A limitation was that the study excluded women and did not extend beyond several years.
Dutasteride, another 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, was studied in a 2014 randomized controlled trial published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. The study included 917 men over 24 weeks and compared dutasteride with finasteride and placebo. Hair growth was assessed using global photography and hair counts. Dutasteride showed superior increases in hair count. However, the relatively short duration limits conclusions about long-term safety.
In summary, DHT-blocking treatments target the root hormonal trigger of follicle miniaturization. By lowering scalp DHT levels, they slow or partially reverse the shrinking process of hair follicles.
What Is VEGF and Why Does It Matter in Hair Growth?
Vascular endothelial growth factor is a signaling protein that stimulates the formation of new blood vessels, a process called angiogenesis. Angiogenesis ensures that tissues receive oxygen and nutrients. Hair follicles are metabolically active structures that require a robust blood supply, especially during the anagen phase, the active growth stage of hair.
A landmark animal study published in 2001 in the Journal of Clinical Investigation by Yano et al. examined transgenic mice engineered to overexpress VEGF in their skin. The researchers observed enhanced perifollicular vascularization and increased hair growth compared to normal mice. The method involved genetic modification in mice and histological examination of skin samples. Hair growth was evaluated using microscopic analysis and growth cycle tracking. While the findings were compelling, a limitation is that animal models do not always replicate human physiology.
Human research has also linked VEGF to hair cycling. A 2012 study published in the British Journal of Dermatology examined scalp biopsies from individuals with androgenic alopecia. Researchers measured VEGF expression using immunohistochemistry techniques. They found reduced VEGF levels in balding scalp compared to non-balding areas. The limitation of this approach is that it identifies association rather than causation.
Minoxidil, an FDA-approved topical treatment first approved in 1988, indirectly increases VEGF expression. Research published in 2002 in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology demonstrated that minoxidil upregulated VEGF mRNA expression in cultured human dermal papilla cells. The method involved laboratory cell cultures and gene expression analysis. Although cell studies provide insight into mechanisms, they cannot fully replicate real-life scalp environments.
Therefore, VEGF-related strategies do not block hormones. Instead, they aim to improve blood vessel formation and nutrient supply around hair follicles, potentially supporting thicker hair growth.
Hormonal Suppression Versus Vascular Support: A Fundamental Difference
The essential distinction between VEGF-based approaches and DHT-blocking treatments lies in their target. DHT blockers address the upstream hormonal cause of follicle miniaturization. VEGF-related strategies aim to improve the follicle’s surrounding environment by enhancing blood flow.
DHT suppression reduces the chemical signal that instructs genetically susceptible follicles to shrink. VEGF enhancement does not change hormonal signaling but may improve oxygenation, nutrient delivery, and possibly prolong the growth phase of hair.
In androgenic alopecia, DHT is widely considered the primary driver. Reviews published by the NIH emphasize that androgen signaling is central to pathogenesis. While reduced blood flow has been observed in balding scalp, it is unclear whether this is a cause or a consequence of follicle miniaturization. This distinction is critical because targeting blood supply without addressing DHT may not stop the underlying miniaturization process.
Clinical Evidence: Strength of Data Behind Each Approach
DHT-blocking therapies are supported by large, multi-center, randomized controlled trials with hundreds or thousands of participants and objective hair count measurements over at least one year. These trials form the basis for FDA approval.
In contrast, VEGF-targeted interventions remain largely indirect. No FDA-approved treatment directly administers VEGF for androgenic alopecia. Instead, treatments like minoxidil increase VEGF as one part of a broader mechanism. While minoxidil is supported by randomized controlled trials, VEGF itself has not been directly approved as a therapeutic injection or topical for pattern hair loss.
Additionally, excessive VEGF stimulation could theoretically pose safety concerns because angiogenesis is involved in tumor growth. The NIH has documented VEGF’s role in cancer biology. This does not mean hair treatments are unsafe, but it highlights why direct VEGF therapy requires careful study.
user experiences
Community discussions on Tressless.com reveal that many users view DHT-blocking treatments such as finasteride and dutasteride as foundational therapies. Users frequently report stabilization of hair loss as the most noticeable benefit, with regrowth occurring more gradually. Conversations often emphasize that stopping DHT is considered essential before pursuing supplementary treatments.
In contrast, VEGF-related discussions typically center on minoxidil. Users describe increased shedding during the initial months, followed by visible thickening. Some users combine DHT blockers with minoxidil, believing the hormonal control addresses the root cause while VEGF stimulation supports growth. Community posts reflect both enthusiasm and skepticism, especially regarding treatments marketed as “blood flow boosters” without strong clinical backing.
These experiences align with the broader scientific literature. DHT suppression tends to stabilize loss, while VEGF-enhancing treatments may improve thickness but do not eliminate hormonal sensitivity.
Research Section
The strongest evidence for DHT’s role comes from human genetic studies in 1974 involving individuals with 5-alpha-reductase deficiency, observed clinically over many years, demonstrating absence of pattern baldness. Evaluation involved hormonal assays and physical examination. The main criticism is rarity of the condition.
Large randomized controlled trials in 1998 and 2014 evaluated finasteride and dutasteride in hundreds to thousands of male participants over 24 to 52 weeks, using standardized scalp photography and hair counts. Limitations include exclusion of women and limited long-term data beyond five years.
Animal research in 2001 using transgenic mice overexpressing VEGF showed enhanced hair growth, evaluated by histology and growth cycle observation. Limitations include species differences.
Cell-based research in 2002 demonstrated minoxidil-induced VEGF expression in cultured human dermal papilla cells using gene expression assays. Limitations include lack of whole-organism complexity.
Biopsy-based human studies in 2012 showed reduced VEGF expression in balding scalp, evaluated through immunohistochemical staining. Limitations include small sample sizes and inability to establish causation.
Conclusion: Addressing Cause Versus Supporting Growth
VEGF and DHT-blocking treatments differ fundamentally in their biological targets. DHT-blocking therapies directly interfere with the hormonal mechanism responsible for follicle shrinkage in genetically predisposed individuals. VEGF-related strategies enhance blood vessel formation and may support the growth environment of hair follicles.
The strongest clinical evidence currently supports DHT suppression as the primary method to halt progression of androgenic alopecia. VEGF enhancement, often through minoxidil, appears to complement but not replace hormonal control. For this reason, many dermatological guidelines and community discussions recommend combining both approaches rather than viewing them as competing strategies.
Ultimately, VEGF influences the environment around the follicle, while DHT determines whether the follicle will continue shrinking. Treating androgenic alopecia effectively requires understanding this distinction.
References
Imperato-McGinley, J., Guerrero, L., Gautier, T., & Peterson, R. E. (1974). Steroid 5-alpha-reductase deficiency in man: An inherited form of male pseudohermaphroditism. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 39(3), 588–598. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4417844
Sawaya, M. E., & Price, V. H. (1997). Different levels of 5alpha-reductase type I and II, aromatase, and androgen receptor in hair follicles of women and men with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 82(12), 4066–4071. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9398710/
Kaufman, K. D., Olsen, E. A., Whiting, D., et al. (1998). Finasteride in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 39(4), 578–589. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9777765/
Olsen, E. A., Hordinsky, M., Whiting, D., et al. (2014). The importance of dual 5α-reductase inhibition in the treatment of male pattern hair loss: A randomized controlled trial of dutasteride versus finasteride. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 70(3), 489–498. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24411083/
Yano, K., Brown, L. F., & Detmar, M. (2001). Control of hair growth and follicle size by VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 107(4), 409–417. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11181641/
Lachgar, S., et al. (2002). Minoxidil upregulates VEGF expression in dermal papilla cells. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 119(4), 1013–1018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12445189/
British Journal of Dermatology Study on VEGF in Androgenetic Alopecia. (2012). Reduced VEGF expression in balding scalp. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22251254/
Tressless Community Discussions on VEGF and DHT Treatments. (n.d.). https://tressless.com/search/VEGF
Tressless Community Discussions on Finasteride. (n.d.). https://tressless.com/search/finasteride